Women’s Days

badge a woman's place

Two women’s events took place last week that I was lucky enough to be involved in.  One was the beginning of the 40th anniversary year of celebration of Rights of Women, the second was an International Women’s Day celebration at Garden Court Chambers.

Rights of Women

Rights of Women was one of the first legal organisations I was involved in when I started practising at the Bar in 1980.  There was an advice line service and every couple of weeks the advice givers (usually baby barristers or trainee solicitors) would climb up the narrow winding stairs to the small ROW office in an old house in Grays Inn Road (the old Time Out building) and then we would answer questions on housing, employment, family law, lesbian custody, domestic violence, immigration.  The need was obvious.  The phones rang constantly.  I became more involved in the organisation.  There were training workshops for new lawyers, sub-groups doing research into areas of law where there were few or no formal statistics.  Family, housing, employment issues troubled many women.  Immigration issues were also coming to the fore.

photo 1(1)

The 80s was a time when Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister, Clause 28 was creeping into the statute books and lesbians were seen as more dangerous than drunken, neglectful fathers. The emphasis was on so-called Family Values.  I joined the Lesbian Custody Support Group.  The workers wrote papers, produced research, including the tragic case law, and produced a legal handbook, Valued Families.  The other sub-groups were doing the same. When the Children Act 1989 came into force, with its test of ‘the best interests of the child’ an excellent piece of research was produced ‘Contact between children and their violent fathers: in whose best interests?’ which was used to educate and inform the judiciary about the effects of domestic violence on children. I joined ROW’s policy group, and in the 90s for a few years I was chair of the organisation.  We organised conferences, seminars, training and parties.  The advice lines continued to run.  It was all vital work, not least because it provided support and assistance to us, the lawyers who were out there in the field.

So last Thursday, I spoke about ROW past.  Hilary Fisher from Women’s Aid which works very closely with ROW talked about the current work, including on the new offence of coercive control.  And looking to the future was Sophia Raja, a trainee solicitor, who has worked with Southall Black Sisters, on the challenges ahead, particularly in light of the cuts to Legal Aid, which is having a severe and deleterious effect on women’s access to justice.  See the Value of Legal Aid – case studies.  It was a good event.  It is so easy to become despondent – we thought we had won the battles but it’s clear now that we need to keep fighting – and it was uplifting to see so many young women in the audience, aware of the issues and keen to take up the struggle.

Rights of Women (1)

The Cuban Five – part 2

International Commission 2014 020

The Cuban 5 are Rene Gonzalez, Ramon Labanino, Fernando Gonzalez, Antonio Guerrero and Gerardo Hernandez.  Last week, Fernando Gonzalez was freed after serving 17 years in jail.

The range and number of witnesses to the Commission of Inquiry indicated the width and complexity of the issues involved.  The first day of the two day hearing dealt with the background to the actions of the 5.  The daughters of two victims of attacks against Cuba – one a mid-flight attack on a Cuban plane, the second an attack on the Cuban Embassy in Lisbon, Portugal, in 1976, spoke of the deaths of their parents.  Giustino di Celmo, by video testimony, the father of the victim of the attack on the hotel in Havana on 4 September 1997, described the events of that day.  Lorenzo Gonzalo from Radio Miami spoke of the activities of the groups in Miami.  And there was a panel discussion, not part of the Commission, with Ramsay Clark, a former US Attorney General, Miguel Angel Marinez, the Vice President of the European Parliament and Ricardo Alarcon, the former President of the National Assembly of Cuba.  And finally, Rene Gonzalez gave his testimony via a Skype link, from Havana.  Rene Gonzalez was released from custody in 2011, having served 14 years in jail.

Rene Gonzalez speaks from Cuba

Rene Gonzalez speaks from Cuba

Through a link that was weak, cracked, and sometimes completely absent, he described his work, infiltrating the groups in Miami and learning about their projects aimed at destabilising the Cuban government.  The information about the groups and their projects was handed to the American authorities.  But instead of arrests being made from the membership of those groups, the Cuban 5 were arrested.

And then began the judicial treatment of the 5 which has been the basis of the concern of campaigners.

On day 2 of the Commission – International Women’s Day – the panel heard evidence about the legal process.  Martin Garbus, described as the world’s leading human rights lawyer, who took over the case after the death of Leonard Weinglass in 2011, spoke about the background and the appeal process.  Then, speaking from a page containing the briefest of notes, Philip Horowitz, the defence lawyer of Rene Gonzalez, held the 300 members of the audience spellbound as he gave what was in effect a closing speech to a jury.  He described the moment the phone in his office rang in 1998 when a representative of the local court said words to the effect, ‘We have a man who needs a representative.  We gave the case to one lawyer but when he became aware of the background to the case he said it was too political and he wouldn’t touch it.’  And at that moment the life of Philip Horowitz changed.  He has seen the children of Rene Gonzalez grow up and have children of their own, he has worked tirelessly to raise the issues, to get visas for the family to visit, to see the papers in the case, to have the trial moved, to take appeal points when possible.  And when Irmita Salanueva, the daughter of Rene Gonzalez, and Olga Salanueva, his wife, gave their evidence, they expressed their enormous gratitude to this down-town defence attorney from Miami.

The trial took place in 2001.  It lasted 7 months.  The jury returned guilty verdicts after 4½ days deliberation.  Between the verdicts and sentencing, September 11 happened.  It does not take a wild stretch of the imagination to imagine that the events of that day had an impact on the sentences the men received in December of the same year.

Amnesty International through Angela Wright, gave evidence of the great concern at the treatment of the 5, and their families.  Amnesty has said that the US treatment of the Cuban 5 is ‘unnecessarily punitive and contrary both to standards for the humand treatment of prisoners and to states’ obligation to protect family life.’

Gerardo Hernandez is serving two life sentences for alleged involvement (a charge of conspiracy) in the shooting down of two planes belonging to the Brothers to the Rescue group, flying over Cuban air-space, where 4 pilots were killed.  It is feared that he will die in prison.  Adriana Perez, the wife of Gerardo Hernandez and Elizabeth Palmeiro the wife of Ramon Labanino, gave moving evidence of their struggles to see their husbands.  Difficulties obtaining visas, being questioned for hours by immigration officials, long journeys across America to the different prisons, to be told on more than one occasion that there was a lock-down in the prison, and no visits were taking place.

International Commission 2014 042On the second day, as on the first there was a panel discussion.  On that second panel were Alice Walker, the novelist, Irmita Salanueva, the daughter of Rene Gonzalez, Mirta Rodriguez, the mother of Antonio Guerrero, and Kenia Serrano the President of the Cuban Institute for Friendship with the Peoples (ICAP).  During the panel session, as Irmita was speaking, a mobile phone rang.  Irmita stopped, saying she was distracted because Mirta Rodriguez was talking to Antonio.  It was Antonio Rodriguez, one of the Five.  He was speaking from prison in the US.  Quickly the phone was switched to loud-speaker and amplified through a microphone and Antonio spoke to the audience.  It was a completely unexpected and powerful moment.  Antonio Rodriguez is due to be released in 2017.

International Commission 2014 045

In May 2005 the United Nations Commission on Human Rights adopted a report criticising the trial and the sentences, noting (section 29) ‘from the facts and circumstances in which the trial took place and from the nature of the charges and the harsh sentences handed down to the accused that the trial did not take place in the climate of objectivity and impartiality  that is required in order to conform to the standards of a fair trial…’

At the end of the second day the panel presented their Preliminary Conclusions, where they expressed the view that pardons should be immediately granted to all five.  The report of the 2014 International Commission of Inquiry is expected to be published in time to be presented to the White House and used as part of a lobbying and information exercise to Congress in June 2014.

The campaign continues.